Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0359019940140010064
Korean Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
1994 Volume.14 No. 1 p.64 ~ p.73
Chinical Comparison of the Traditional Versus Laparoscopic Surgery in Cholecystectomy for Cholelithiasis



Abstract
Laparascapic Cholecystectomy is a recentely rapidly emerged, minimally invasive procedure whereby the gallbladder is removed using laparoscopic techniques. The procedure offers the patients reduced hospital stay, faster to work, less pain, less
complication, less expensiveness, and improved cosmetic results over the traditional open cholecystectomy. Cholecystectomy for treatment of cholelithiasis or gallbladder polyp was performed in 294 patients at Anam Hospital Korea university. Out
of
them,
118k persons were performed with traditional open procedure from September 1990 to June 1993 to June 193(A group), 176 persons with laparoscopic procedure from September 1991 ot September 1992(B group). We compared the diagnostic tools, previous
operative history, associated disoder, operative time, postoperative condition, hospital stay, gallbladder pathology, conversion to open cholecystectomy, and hospital costs between A and B goup.
@ES The results were as follows;
@EN 1) Mean ages between A group(52.6 years old) and B group( 54.6 years old) were not significantly different. Sex ratio were 1:1.4in male and female in A group and 1:2 B group.
2) Diagnostic procedures were abdominal sonogram without other study(61%), ERCP(29%), and abdominal CT(4%) including abdominal sonogram in A group, oral cholecystogram(50%), and ERCP(35%) including andominal sonogram and without other study
(13%)
in B
group in order of frequency.
3) Average operative times were 64.8 min. in A group, 65.6 min. in B group, but laparoscopic operative time decreased with experience.
4) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 30 patients(17%), who had previous abdominal operative history which had been commonly considered relative contraindication of laparoscapic cholecystectomy.
5) Conversion to open operation was necessary in 10 of 176 patients(5.7%). The cause of conversion was severe adhesion in 4 patients, active bleeding in 2 patients, contracted gallblader with bleeding in 2 patients, and suspected GB cancer in 2
patients.
6) the complication rate was 8.5%, and wound infection(5.1%), pulmonary complication(2.5%), bleeding, through drain(0.8%) in order of frequency in A group. It group. It was 6.3%, and mild wound pain, prolonged ileus and bleeding in order of
frequency
of frequency in B group.
7) Average postaperative hospital stay was 7.4 days in A group and 3.2 days in B group.
8) Hospital costs was 1,327,313 won in A group and 2,208,461 won in B group.
Laproscapic cholecystecomy is safe and effective therapeutic modality which was compared to open chalecystecttomy for cholelithiasis.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø